Institutional Change On First Nations: Examining Factors Influencing First Nations’ Adoption of the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management

Authors

  • Mary Doidge
  • B. James Deaton
  • Bethany Woods

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/jaed334

Keywords:

Agreements, Autonomy, Business And Economics, Codes, Demography, Economic growth, Ethnic Interests, Government, Hypotheses, Institutional change, Land, Land use planning, Native North Americans, Proximity, Socioeconomic factors, Urban areas, First Nations Land Management, First Nations Land Management Act, First Nations economic leadership, First Nations economy

Abstract

In 1999 the Canadian Federal government passed the First Nations Land Management Act, ratifying the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management signed by the government and 14 original signatory First Nations in 1996. This Agreement allows First Nations to opt out of the 34 land code provisions of the Indian Act and develop individual land codes, and has been promoted as a means of increasing First Nation autonomy and facilitating economic growth and development on reserve lands. There are currently 77 First Nation signatories to the Agreement, 39 with operational independent land codes. This paper is the first to empirically examine factors that may influence a First Nation's decision to become signatory to the Framework Agreement. A unique dataset characterizing each First Nation by socio-economic and demographic characteristics is used with a probit model to determine the effects of these characteristics on the probability of First Nation adoption of the Agreement. The results of this study indicate that proximity to an urban centre positively affects the probability that a First Nation will adopt. However, the statistical strength of this finding is sensitive to the inclusion of an education variable in the regression.

References

Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson & J.A. Robinson. 2002. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4): 1231–94.

Acemoglu, D., & J.A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business: New York.

Alcantara, C. 2007. “Reduce Transaction Costs? Yes. Strengthen Property Rights? Maybe: The First Nations Land Management Act and Economic Development on Canadian Indian Reserves”. Public Choice 132(3–4): 421–32.

Alcantara, C. 2005. “Certificates of Possession and First Nations Housing: A Case Study of the Six Nations Housing Program”. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 20(2): 183–205.

Alcantara, C. 2003. “Individual property rights on Canadian Indian reserves: The Historical Emergence and Jurisprudence of Certificates of Possession”. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 23(2): 391–424.

Benson, B.L. 1981. “Land Use Regulation: A Supply And Demand Analysis of Changing Property Rights”. The Journal of Libertarian Studies 5(4): 435–51.

Coase, R.H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost”. Journal of Law and Economics 3 (October): 1–44.

Deaton, B.J. (Interviewer) & Chief R. Louie (Interviewee). 2012. First Nations Lands and Economies [podcast]. <http://www.uoguelph.ca/fare/FARE-talk/index.html#first> [Accessed May 9, 2013.]

Deaton, B.J., L. Busch, W.J. Samuels & P. Thompson. 2010. “A Note on the Economy of Qualities: Attributing Production Practices to Agricultural Practices”. Journal of Rural Social Sciences. 25(3): 99–110.

Demsetz, H. 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights”. The American Economic Review 57(2): 347–59.

Department of Justice. 1985. Indian Act. Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. <http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-5/FullText.html> [Accessed May 2, 2013.]

LABRC. 2012. Annual Report: 2011–2012. <http://www.labrc.com/documents/annualreports/11%2012%20AR.pdf> [Accessed April 30, 2013.]

LABRC. 2003. Annual Report: 2002–2003. <http://www.labrc.com/documents/annualreports/0203AR.pdf> [Accessed May 9, 2013.]

Merrill, T.W. 2002. “Introduction: The Demsetz Thesis and the Evolution of Property Right”. The Journal of Legal Studies 31(S2): S331–S338.

Moretti, E. 2012. The New Geography of Jobs. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

North, D.C., & R.P. Thomas. 1970. “An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World”. The Economic History Review 23(1): 1–17.

Williamson, C.R., & C.B. Kerekes. 2011. “Securing Private Property: Formal Versus Informal Institutions”. Journal of Law and Economics 54(3): 537–72.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

Issue

Section

Lessons From Research